Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 22:36:54 +0300 From: Andrey Slusar <anrays@gmail.com> To: Mark Evenson <evenson@panix.com>, <m.boyarov@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: setting EMACS_PORT_NAME=emacs22 forks make infinitely at the port registration step Message-ID: <86bqtoy1m1.fsf@santinel.home.ua> In-Reply-To: <e4vm6k$obv$1@sea.gmane.org> (Mark Evenson's message of "Tue, 23 May 2006 21:01:38 %2B0200") References: <200204301328.g3UDS9X43078@thelonious.eziba.com> <e4vm6k$obv$1@sea.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Tue, 23 May 2006 21:01:38 +0200, Mark Evenson wrote:
> Jay Sachs wrote:
> >> Number: 37596
> >> Category: ports
> >> Synopsis: EMACS_PORT_NAME=xemacs21 forks make infinitely when installing other ports
This bug is uncorrectly fixed.
> When setting EMACS_PORT_NAME=emacs22 (The new Emacs has some nice new
> features esp. wrt. Lisp development) on the command line or in
> /etc/make.conf, the ports mechanism forks infinitely at the port
> registration step. Eventually this forking stops when the recursion
> limit is reached, but gosh does it take a long time on a slow
> machine. Or even a fast machine for that matter.
> This seems to be identical to the symptom that was fixed with
> ports/37596, and I don't really understand why it would be
> returning. Maybe it is from some other cause?
> This is happening on freshly supped ports trees under RELENG_6_1 on
> several machines (two new, one quite old that has been nursed along
> over the years since 2001), using portupgrade -ras to keep ports in
> sync with dependencies.
> The recursively invoked make(1)s look like this from a ps:
> root 86542 8.4 0.4 1284 1136 p3 S+ 8:54PM 0:00.28 make
> CHILD_DEPENDS=yes PARENT_CHECKED= package-depends-list
> The empty PARENT_CHECKED is suspicious, but when I run manually with a
> value, it still forks forever.
> Am I using the EMACS_PORT_NAME variable correctly? (i.e. its not a
> forbidden user knob like USE_XXX)
> Can I help provide more information?
> Should I reopen the bug report or start a new one?
See this fix, submitted by nobutaka. This is now in testing and later
committed to ports tree.
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
--- Mk/bsd.port.mk.orig Tue May 23 22:21:46 2006
+++ Mk/bsd.port.mk Tue May 23 22:22:03 2006
@@ -1339,7 +1339,7 @@
.include "${PORTSDIR}/Mk/bsd.openssl.mk"
.endif
-.if defined(USE_EMACS) || defined(EMACS_PORT_NAME)
+.if defined(USE_EMACS)
.include "${PORTSDIR}/Mk/bsd.emacs.mk"
.endif
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
--
Regards,
Andrey.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86bqtoy1m1.fsf>