Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 3 Oct 2000 16:27:20 -0700
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Cc:        Paul Richards <paul@originative.co.uk>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/finger finger.c
Message-ID:  <20001003162720.D51546@freefall.freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <200010031800.MAA27859@harmony.village.org>; from imp@village.org on Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 12:00:57PM -0600
References:  <39DA182C.C70ED553@originative.co.uk> <39D98B55.126DAFC4@originative.co.uk> <200010022227.PAA62603@freefall.freebsd.org> <39D92E08.E00CF2E4@owp.csus.edu> <20001002180303.A40584@freefall.freebsd.org> <39D98B55.126DAFC4@originative.co.uk> <200010031530.JAA26493@harmony.village.org> <20001003124008.A4892@netmonger.net> <39DA182C.C70ED553@originative.co.uk> <200010031800.MAA27859@harmony.village.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 12:00:57PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <39DA182C.C70ED553@originative.co.uk> Paul Richards writes:
> : I think we should have a stable release team, that changes to the stable
> : branch should be gated through to ensure they're thouroughly tested and
> : that there's a need for them to be backported. I'd be happy to work with
> : anyone else who wants to volunteer to do that since maintaining a stable
> : version of the OS is a major issue for me with my new hat on.
> 
> I'd support this strongly, both as Warner Losh, Committer and as
> Warner Losh, Security Officer.  My current job uses -stable and needs
> to have it be sane at "all"[*] times, or we waste a lot of effort
> bringing in and backing out unstable versions (we do some sanity
> testing before bringing a version in, but there's only so much you can
> do).

I think a formal MFC process may be too stifling, unless we have a
VERY responsive MFC team. Consider that we don't want the same thing
to happen as did with 3.x, where 4.0-CURRENT was allowed to diverge so
much that merging bugfixes became difficult.

I'd settle for committers being more cautious about merging their own
changes and self-managing the process better.

Kris

--
In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate.
    -- Charles Forsythe <forsythe@alum.mit.edu>


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001003162720.D51546>