Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 11:39:40 -0500 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: John Utz <john@utzweb.net> Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Serious Progess Re: smbios.ko probes successfully if i disable acpi sysresource, fails if i do not Message-ID: <200611021139.41252.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4FC5FAF0-0490-48D3-B471-59CEDEC7F512@utzweb.net> References: <FBFBCF13-54B0-4825-A115-4CDDE4215CD7@utzweb.net> <200611011051.00658.jhb@freebsd.org> <4FC5FAF0-0490-48D3-B471-59CEDEC7F512@utzweb.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 01 November 2006 23:18, John Utz wrote: > > On Nov 1, 2006, at 7:51 AM, John Baldwin wrote: > > > On Tuesday 31 October 2006 18:47, john@utzweb.net wrote: > >> > >> So i actually do use pmap_mapdev to get a handle to the table, but > >> i dont > >> do that in smbios_attach, i do it in a function written to walk > >> the table. > >> > >> but, as i alluded to previously, the original author used > >> bus_alloc_resource() in smbios_attach() are you saying that i > >> should use > >> pmap_mapdev() in smbios_attach *instead* of bus_alloc_resource()? > > > > Yes. Firmware tables are not resources (at least IMHO). > > ok then. > > so since pmap_mapdev() returns a void* what is the current blessed > type that should be used for pmap_ memory handles in smbios_softc? Eh? Any pointer will do. :) > i saw something char*-ish in digi_isa.c, but i saw few enuf examples > that it seems to be worth asking.... > > tnx! > > johnu > > > -- > > John Baldwin > > > > -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200611021139.41252.jhb>