Date: Tue, 7 Nov 1995 12:57:14 -0700 From: Nate Williams <nate@rocky.sri.MT.net> To: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> Cc: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard), graichen@sirius.physik.fu-berlin.de, hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ideas from netbsd Message-ID: <199511071957.MAA26537@rocky.sri.MT.net> In-Reply-To: <199511062256.PAA16491@phaeton.artisoft.com> References: <1444.815696140@time.cdrom.com> <199511062256.PAA16491@phaeton.artisoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Terry Lambert writes: > > > Linux DOSEMU. Other VM86(). > > > > This is going to be solved by adding general NetBSD user binary > > emulation? Helloooooo Terry!! :) > > Why would "general NetBSD user binary emulation" require any kernel > options at all? Because DOSEMU requires *LOTS* of kernel changes for VM86. No userland code would work w/out the kernel mods. Also, last time I looked VM86() support *still* isn't in the release kernel, and I don't know if the patches still being kept up-to-date. > If you don't want kernel examples (ie: AFS was a bad example), then > what about NetBSD's thread environment for their JAVA port? What thread environment? You mean CAP's, which is also available for FreeBSD? Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199511071957.MAA26537>