Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 20:32:41 +0200 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com> To: Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@mail.ru> Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, Sergey Matveychuk <sem@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: ports/91775: New port: graphics/gnash GNU Flash movie player Message-ID: <20060114203241.28393cf2@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro> In-Reply-To: <20060114170253.GB1114@hades.panopticon> References: <43C8E4EC.7030703@FreeBSD.org> <20060114170253.GB1114@hades.panopticon>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 14 Jan 2006 20:02:53 +0300
Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@mail.ru> wrote:
> * Sergey Matveychuk (sem@FreeBSD.org) wrote:
>
> > 1) I think it's better to use a version number for port number, not
> > snapshot. Just like that:
> > PORTVERSION=0.7
> > DISTNAME=${PORTNAME}-20051226
> That's nonapparent. It's strange that newborn project has version 0.7,
> maybe the version won't be changed between snapshot releases.
> Still I've changed the version, as 0.7 can be easily changed back to
> 2006xxxx style without bumping the PORTEPOCH, if it's needed.
Why not 0.7-2005.12.26 ? I think it;s more clear this way.
[ ... ]
> > 4) I'm not sure how .omf file should be processed but it should
> > some way (see INSTALLS_OMF in bsd.gnome.mk). Using of
> > USE_GNOME=something will fix an extra dirs problem (Ion-Mihai Tetcu
> > pointed to). I'm not familar with a GNOME stuff but I'll try to
> > clarify how it should be processed.
> Yes, thanks for the hint. USE_GNOME=gnomehier does the thing.
TinderFoxy'ed OK :)
--
IOnut
Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060114203241.28393cf2>