Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 07:41:44 -0500 From: Josh Paetzel <josh@tcbug.org> To: "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, John Freeman <quake2k@mail.ru> Subject: Re: Fw: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-07:07.bind Message-ID: <20070805124144.GH83613@tcbug.org> In-Reply-To: <20070802105338.GA1088@zaphod.nitro.dk> References: <001a01c7d4ee$d73f3fe0$26c39605@A3000> <20070802105338.GA1088@zaphod.nitro.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--ik0NlRzMGhMnxrMX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Simon L. Nielsen wrote: > On 2007.08.02 14:21:07 +0400, John Freeman wrote: > >=20 > >> John Freeman wrote: > >>=20 > >>> Same problem on AMD64 build. I'm too lazy to attach full text, this > >>> system doesn't use bind and jail. > >>=20 > >> What branch are you tracking? > >=20 > > After today's cvsup all ok , it solved? Wasn't compile only after patch= =20 > > included in SA. >=20 > RELENG_6 was already fixed 2007-07-25 08:23:08 UTC by dougb, so the > patch wasn't tested against RELENG_6 at all but only against the > release / security branches. Most of the time the released patches > will work against the stable branches, but not always. >=20 > --=20 > Simon L. Nielsen > FreeBSD Security Team This is sort of an unusual situation isn't it, where RELENG_6 is fixed prior to the SA being released? If so it might have been useful for the SA to say something about affecting STABLE before xxxx-xx-xx where xxxx-xx-xx is the date that the fix was committed. --=20 Thanks, Josh Paetzel --ik0NlRzMGhMnxrMX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGtcWHJvkB8SevrssRAiORAKCSGhQp2JCDS60D+zGMt3R2vJ3X3wCeNLc7 gEUrbY6VH11/MJIpaRVqwwE= =8VOw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ik0NlRzMGhMnxrMX--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070805124144.GH83613>