Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 02:06:43 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper <youshi10@u.washington.edu> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: parallel builds revisited Message-ID: <461DF6A3.9030201@u.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <1176363454.72184.2.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> References: <200704100452.40574.mail@maxlor.com> <1176227087.27233.8.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> <200704120543.53063.mail@maxlor.com> <1176363454.72184.2.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Pav Lucistnik wrote: > Benjamin Lutz píše v čt 12. 04. 2007 v 05:43 +0200: > > >> Is there any detailed information available on what's planned here >> that >> isn't in your description on SoC page? >> > > I don't know if I can forward you the proposal text, they might not be > public. But it's basically copy&paste from the Ideas page. > > >>> USE_MAKE_JOBS= 2 >>> >> Yes, that's what I had in mind as a final goal too. Having a single file >> whitelist is useful though, since you don't have to patch hundreds of >> makefiles while the whole thing is being tested and developed. >> > > I came up with a preliminary patch, check it out at > http://people.freebsd.org/~pav/makejobs.diff > > >>> I have great interest in this development. This is a highly desirable >>> feature to have. >>> >> Me too. Could you keep me in the loop on how the SoC project progresses? >> Seeing how that's concentrating on inter-port-parallelism, I think I'll >> continue to work on intra-port-parallelism for a bit. >> > > That's likely to how its gonna turn out, yeah. The SoC proposal > concentrates on "inter-port". I dunno how you want to approach this, but gmake does recommend 2 jobs be run in parallel for HTT enabled chips, and 3 or 4 jobs for a dual core machines. -Garrett
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?461DF6A3.9030201>