Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 25 Dec 2010 20:52:30 +0100
From:      Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>
To:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: lagg/lacp poor traffic distribution
Message-ID:  <if5i1t$evk$1@dough.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <4D123B7C.1070104@rdtc.ru>
References:  <4D0CFEFF.3000902@rdtc.ru>	<1292844095.1917.136.camel@stormi>	<4D1083D6.6010707@rdtc.ru>	<84530C06-AC2E-4E2B-BFD4-693902BB0FA6@netasq.com>	<4D10B2F4.1060404@rdtc.ru>	<90F64F73-F9A8-4FD6-9303-2FC0D3424751@netasq.com>	<4D10BE3E.6030506@rdtc.ru>	<BDB1F984-9F2A-4746-B74E-4CABC952D3E2@netasq.com> <4D123B7C.1070104@rdtc.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 22.12.2010 18:55, Eugene Grosbein wrote:

> It seems, we really need sysctl disabling lagg's use of flows, don't we?

If no developer is willing to work on it right now, you should probably
create a PR with your patch so it doesn't get lost.

Also, a patch describing the sysctl in the lagg(4) man page would
probably get it committed faster :)




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?if5i1t$evk$1>