Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 15:43:35 -0600 From: Mark Felder <feld@FreeBSD.org> To: Jim Thompson <jim@netgate.com>, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fernando=20Apestegu=EDa?= <fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, Mark Heily <mark@heily.com> Subject: Re: relaunchd: a portable clone of launchd Message-ID: <1448315015.3831110.448098897.54B341BF@webmail.messagingengine.com> In-Reply-To: <8FF83C2F-D8CD-4366-A890-7EF605050456@netgate.com> References: <CAGfo=8nPxY6SW%2B04R4sN_a1udOuVRLEownM4p2Yz5Y8YGvheeA@mail.gmail.com> <F18891B6-5375-46DC-A781-3CA4B1C211DE@jeamland.net> <CAGfo=8=8Np_59AzMwzVS1abm=oJ6VzLuZH1H765s9-fF0SJ2zg@mail.gmail.com> <CAGwOe2ZXBcK2LtoqfjcuXQrOuU8xq9Q5FaHT_tO761r7exzG6g@mail.gmail.com> <8FF83C2F-D8CD-4366-A890-7EF605050456@netgate.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015, at 02:20, Jim Thompson wrote: >=20 >=20 > > On Nov 18, 2015, at 1:32 AM, Fernando Apestegu=EDa <fernando.apesteguia= @gmail.com> wrote: > >=20 > > Anyway, I agree that if we are going to replace a key component of the > > system we may want to discuss which approach is best (launchd, > > relaunchd, OpenRC, svc, etc...). >=20 > And thus the bike shed begins before it's built.=20 > I hope we defer the "discussion" to a roundtable between the actual authors of launchd, relaunchd, and nosh and the affected parties: * src committers who maintain things in base this will affect * rc.subr shareholders * portmgr (port rc scripts *cannot* break and need a migration path) Lets not let this stagnate for years. Those who write the code get the votes. --=20 Mark Felder ports-secteam member feld@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1448315015.3831110.448098897.54B341BF>