Date: Wed, 6 Oct 1999 14:15:09 -0400 (EDT) From: Stuart Krivis <stuart@apk.net> To: Hugh LaMaster <lamaster@nren.nasa.gov> Cc: "FreeBSD-Net (FreeBSD.Org)" <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Tulip drivers for BSD. Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.9910061412180.28086-100000@junior.apk.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.3.96.991006101028.25194d-100000@george.arc.nasa.gov>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 6 Oct 1999, Hugh LaMaster wrote: > NICs have stopped marking on the packages what chipset > they use, and some have switched chipsets within the > same product line. At this point, I have no idea how > to tell which current product lines use the Tulip chipset. > Is anyone keeping a current list? Is the Tulip chipset > still in production/widespread use? I have several recent Kingston KNE100 cards with an Intel version of the Tulip. It seems to work quite well. > > What are FreeBSD'ers recommending these days wrt multicast > and CPU efficiency (and, which is currently supported)? I hear a lot about the Intel Pro100 cards. In fact, people seem to like them over the Tulip cards. I keep wondering whatever happened to 3Com cards. They used to be the best choice because they worked with everything. -- Stuart Krivis stuart@krivis.com Fourth law of programming: Anything that can go wrong wi sendmail: segmentation violation - core dumped To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.10.9910061412180.28086-100000>