Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 09:40:42 +0200 From: Lars Engels <lars.engels@0x20.net> To: ???????????? ???????????? <momchil@xaxo.eu> Cc: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ULE Scheduler Message-ID: <20120612074042.GG5592@e-new.0x20.net> In-Reply-To: <86sje17jnx.wl%momchil@xaxo.eu> References: <86fwa8szos.wl%momchil@xaxo.eu> <4FD000FE.6090505@FreeBSD.org> <4FD41340.3050003@FreeBSD.org> <86sje17jnx.wl%momchil@xaxo.eu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--N77v08gAD5x46FmO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 09:06:26PM +0200, ???????????? ???????????? wrote: > At Sat, 09 Jun 2012 20:23:44 -0700, > Doug Barton wrote: > >=20 > > On 06/06/2012 18:16, Doug Barton wrote: > > > On 06/06/2012 18:01, ???????????? ???????????? wrote: > > >> Is there some remedy? > > >=20 > > > Try the 4BSD scheduler. > >=20 > > Did you ever try this? Did it help? >=20 > I compiled the same kernel with the 4BSD scheduler today and it seems > that the processes jump accross cores too. My "eye" measure with "top" > fells like it's more stable and probably converges faster to a stable > state after "top" jumps accross cores. But in order to talk with > numbers, I need to replace "top" with somethings that dumps the > process number and the cpu id continuously in order to get some > statistics out of it, otherwise you can just forget all the things > that I have written. Is there an easy way to do that and are you > interested? Maybe sysutils/atop is useful here? --N77v08gAD5x46FmO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk/W8noACgkQKc512sD3afguggCdFRZyZC6s1rtRlXIaXCZEAXp4 tdIAn3nLfuzyFjqmOksWO+PREntXBO0r =wtIt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --N77v08gAD5x46FmO--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120612074042.GG5592>