Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 23:23:32 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua> To: Dan Naumov <dan.naumov@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, mandrews@bit0.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, rnoland@freebsd.org, freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8.0-RELEASE / gpart / GPT / marking a partition as "active" Message-ID: <4B5622D4.2070602@icyb.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <cf9b1ee01001191309u66492d80rd1500329deceb6d1@mail.gmail.com> References: <cf9b1ee01001190911r52e51f1dn46bdeda4e15c1c97@mail.gmail.com> <4B55FF44.4040308@icyb.net.ua> <cf9b1ee01001191309u66492d80rd1500329deceb6d1@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 19/01/2010 23:09 Dan Naumov said the following: >> After using gpart to create the GPT (and thus the PMBR and its >> bootcode), why not simply use "fdisk -a -1 DISKNAME" to set the PMBR >> partition active? > > According to the fdisk output, the partition flag did change from 0 to > 80. Can the "fdisk: Class not found" error showing up at the very end > of the procedure of doing "fdisk -a -1 DISKNAME" be safely ignored? Yes, I think so. -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B5622D4.2070602>