Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 08:09:17 +0300 From: Vallo Kallaste <kalts@estpak.ee> To: Petri Helenius <pete@he.iki.fi> Cc: Tim Robbins <tjr@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: raidframe Message-ID: <20030602050917.GB2247@kevad.internal> In-Reply-To: <039101c328e2$09bce480$812a40c1@PETEX31> References: <3ED9E8AB.5060106@he.iki.fi> <20030601232426.A43338@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au> <00b501c32876$74502fd0$812a40c1@PETEX31> <3EDA600C.90104@btc.adaptec.com> <039101c328e2$09bce480$812a40c1@PETEX31>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 11:36:18AM +0300, Petri Helenius <pete@he.iki.fi> wrote: > > left behind. I am remis in not fixing it, but please understand > > that I also have quite a few other responsibilities, and I get > > paid $0 to work on RAIDframe. > > > Not being a native english speaker I probably didn´t understand > that experimental equals broken. If that equation cannot be > justified, then the release notes should have said "has critical > defects" or "broken", not just "experimental". > > I appreciate the work you and everybody else puts in, it just does > not make sense to have people go through the same hoops and hit > the wall when that could be saved by a single line noting that > that the wall exists. FreeBSD 5.x series is slowly progressing, but is nowhere near to production quality. As the things are currently, you simply waste your time. This is only my opinion and I don't want to offend anyone. -- Vallo Kallaste
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030602050917.GB2247>