Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 3 May 2006 14:12:45 -0300 (ADT)
From:      "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>
To:        Wilko Bulte <wb@freebie.xs4all.nl>
Cc:        "Zimmerman, Eric" <Zimmerman.Eric@con-way.com>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Hyperthreading in 6.x ... still frowned upon?
Message-ID:  <20060503141133.I1147@ganymede.hub.org>
In-Reply-To: <20060503162839.GB33963@freebie.xs4all.nl>
References:  <12AAD6CC50A25841834F43955F39B66E042ADC4F@qgaes001.conway.prod.con-way.com> <20060503130544.K1147@ganymede.hub.org> <20060503162839.GB33963@freebie.xs4all.nl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 3 May 2006, Wilko Bulte wrote:

> On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 01:06:24PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote..
>> On Wed, 3 May 2006, Zimmerman, Eric wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>> In 4.x, it was a 'shut it off' sort of deal .. my new amd64 don't
>>> appear
>>>> to have it enabled, but my older i386 server that I just upgraded to
>>> 6.x
>>>> does:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Is it still something that I should disable, and, if so, how in 6.x?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Can you disable it in the BIOS or do you dual boot this machine?
>>
>> Unfortunately, this is a remote server, and not HP, so getting at the BIOS
>> is tricky ... :(  Is there a sysctl variable that can be set for this?
>
> As a matter of curiosity:  do you run RILOE to get console access on your
> HPs?

If RILOE == iLO via SSH ... most definitely ... can't rave enough about 
it, just wish I could afford to replace all the *old* servers with these, 
would reduce my 'remote admin stress levels' by half easily ...

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060503141133.I1147>