Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 12:32:54 -0500 (EST) From: Mikhail Teterin <mi@aldan.algebra.com> To: Christopher Michaels <ChrisMic@clientlogic.com> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bind in a sandbox (was: Anticipated release date for 3.4) Message-ID: <199911191732.MAA08589@misha.cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <6C37EE640B78D2118D2F00A0C90FCB4401105D9E@site2s1> from Christopher Michaels at "Nov 19, 1999 12:19:58 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Christopher Michaels once wrote:
> After reading that I was hoping someone could give me some assistance.
> I would like to run bind in a sandbox.
>
> My problem is that I am on a dynamic IP and when I run it in a
> sandbox, it complains about not being able to bind to port 53 for the
> new address on the interface.
>
> Does anyone know of a way around this? (does bind need to listen to
> port 53 on the outside interface)?
No it does not. In fact, it should not, because this way it can be
abused by people outside your lan. May be, we can patch our bind to
automaticly detect dynamic interfaces and not listen on them by default?
You want to add something like:
listen-on {
127.0.0.1;
10.10.0.1; // list your other interfaces here
};
to the options-section of your named.conf. This, actually, belongs to
the questions@freebsd.org mailing list.
-mi
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199911191732.MAA08589>