Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 16:48:25 +0530 From: Gobbledegeek <gobbledegeek@gmail.com> To: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: output of top command question Message-ID: <463aea570511140318ib57ff3esbc4e74273b9d81a9@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20051114073607.GA1138@flame.pc> References: <463aea570511102258o5902b394s77f1caca3a17c0c3@mail.gmail.com> <20051111072901.GA1948@flame.pc> <463aea570511112317v3a00dbbfv98f65e3781450bd0@mail.gmail.com> <20051112100010.GA1945@flame.pc> <463aea570511122358l2ab2db59u3cebc04a42de8aa@mail.gmail.com> <20051113081402.GA18897@flame.pc> <463aea570511131950n61de9f59q756daf0ef7d1bed9@mail.gmail.com> <20051114073607.GA1138@flame.pc>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Yep! Thanks Giorgos. Bye! Rgrds On 11/14/05, Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> wrote: > On 2005-11-14 09:20, Gobbledegeek <gobbledegeek@gmail.com> wrote: > > like the old sticky bit I see .. > > Almost. But it applies to "virtual memory pages", regardless of > their attachment to any particular process and it's controlled by > the kernel itself, not by userlevel :) > > > So to find out physical ram used, I need to subtract total > > physical ram - free, to arrive at the figure I suppose.. or add > > up active, inactive, wired, buf .. ?? > > Sounds reasonable :) > > -- Nonchalantly yours GobbledeGeek [Everything but Gobbledegook.. !!]
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?463aea570511140318ib57ff3esbc4e74273b9d81a9>