Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 02:29:36 +0300 From: Peter Pentchev <roam@orbitel.bg> To: appleseed@hushmail.com Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: What is ipfw telling me ? Message-ID: <20010630022936.E887@ringworld.oblivion.bg> In-Reply-To: <200106292259.PAA15697@user7.hushmail.com>; from appleseed@hushmail.com on Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 04:00:09PM -0500 References: <200106292259.PAA15697@user7.hushmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 04:00:09PM -0500, appleseed@hushmail.com wrote: > >Uhm. ipfw(4) is stateful, too. I suggest you take a look at ipfw(4) > >and ipfw(8) :) > Uhm. So what? Ipf > ipfw ;-) In some respects, probably. Your statement, though, seemed to imply that ipfw was not able of keeping track of state, and ipf was. That's what I tried to correct. G'luck, Peter -- If there were no counterfactuals, this sentence would not have been paradoxical. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010630022936.E887>