Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 05:25:03 -0800 From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG>, Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Need review - patch for socket locking and ref counting Message-ID: <3BF6652F.FC50C99A@mindspring.com> References: <XFMail.011115124557.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <200111170300.fAH30dv75857@apollo.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Matthew Dillon wrote: > > I've thought about it a bit and I've come to the conclusion that > we should *not* have multiple mutex pools. It's pretty obvious even under casual thought that the deadlock avoidance can't work correctly in theis scenario, so you MUST limit yourself to last acquisition. By the same token, it does not make sense to permit recursion on such mutexes. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3BF6652F.FC50C99A>