Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 22 May 2013 09:31:26 +0300
From:      Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Orit Moskovich <oritm@mellanox.com>
Cc:        "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD spinlock - compatibility layer
Message-ID:  <519C663E.1090307@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <981733489AB3BD4DB24B48340F53E0A55B0D39EF@MTLDAG01.mtl.com>
References:  <981733489AB3BD4DB24B48340F53E0A55B0CFD79@MTLDAG01.mtl.com> <201305200950.26834.jhb@freebsd.org> <981733489AB3BD4DB24B48340F53E0A55B0D091F@MTLDAG01.mtl.com> <201305211220.16776.jhb@freebsd.org> <981733489AB3BD4DB24B48340F53E0A55B0D39EF@MTLDAG01.mtl.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 22/05/2013 09:14 Orit Moskovich said the following:
> From what I've read in "FreeBSD - device drivers" book by Joseph Kong on
> interrupt handling, you cannot voluntarily context switch (that is, sleep) in
> interrupt threads .

See the table at the end of locking(9) manual page.

-- 
Andriy Gapon



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?519C663E.1090307>