Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2000 15:49:25 +0000 From: David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie> To: Jonathan Lemon <jlemon@flugsvamp.com> Cc: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>, Dan Kegel <dank@alumni.caltech.edu>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kqueue microbenchmark results Message-ID: <20001207154925.A25785@walton.maths.tcd.ie> In-Reply-To: <20001025170117.C87091@prism.flugsvamp.com>; from jlemon@flugsvamp.com on Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 05:01:17PM -0500 References: <20001024225637.A54554@prism.flugsvamp.com> <39F6655A.353FD236@alumni.caltech.edu> <20001025115457.X28123@fw.wintelcom.net> <20001025170117.C87091@prism.flugsvamp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 05:01:17PM -0500, Jonathan Lemon wrote: > I'd love to do that, but am not quite sure how I'd go about it. > If you read the l-k mailing list, you'll see Linus calling kqueue > "overengineered", and what he is proposing is something that is > definitely not well thought out. Maybe Alexander Viro could help? He often follows what's happening in the BSD world and seems to do lots of good VFS type work in the Linux world. Matt Dillon recently worked with him on the file discriptor locking patches he committed. David. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001207154925.A25785>