Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 01:19:25 +0200 From: Benjamin Lutz <benlutz@datacomm.ch> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Not an easy install Message-ID: <200603270119.28109.benlutz@datacomm.ch> In-Reply-To: <4425611B.8030506@daleco.biz> References: <20060325160217.squjojr5uy2ogg0c@webmail.dommel.be> <4425611B.8030506@daleco.biz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart1443642.Q9a2cHUiP9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 25 March 2006 16:26, Kevin Kinsey wrote: > Installer, yes. "good system for installing programs" ... some would > differ. Ease of use isn't the only thing that FreeBSD ports offers, > and I'm not sure that PCBSD has that figured out; obviously, that's > open for discussion. Seems to me, and some others, that PCBSD's > implementation of 3rd party software may get its users in the same > sort of "libc hell" that many Linux users find themselves in someplace > down the road. I tried PC-BSD a couple of weeks ago. What they seem to do is include all t= he=20 necessary libs with a program, and install each program into a dedicated=20 library. So while there is bloat, a library hell there shouldn't be. Cheers Benjamin --nextPart1443642.Q9a2cHUiP9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEJyGAgShs4qbRdeQRAn3EAJwNmgUZPgf5os0jwsw24PS0A0rdrACfXjQG W/U2ahEA+nLuOvHSyD94k40= =BAT5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1443642.Q9a2cHUiP9--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200603270119.28109.benlutz>