Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 02:07:13 +0300 From: Aggelos Economopoulos <aoiko@cc.ece.ntua.gr> To: Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Status of SCHED_ULE? Message-ID: <200309300207.13767.aoiko@cc.ece.ntua.gr> In-Reply-To: <20030929181154.E99666-100000@mail.chesapeake.net> References: <20030929181154.E99666-100000@mail.chesapeake.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 30 September 2003 01:12, Jeff Roberson wrote: > On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Aggelos Economopoulos wrote: > > On Monday 29 September 2003 08:05, Jeff Roberson wrote: > > > On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Arjan van Leeuwen wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > > It happens when compiling stuff, when loading complicated pages in > > > > Mozilla Firebird, and when logging out of GNOME 2.4 (the 'background > > > > fade' animation brings my Athlon XP 2000+ to its knees when I use > > > > SCHED_ULE). > > > > > > > > Arjan > > > > > > Gnome seems to be a common theme. Are you also using libkse? There > > > could be some interaction there. > > > > I'm experiencing similar stuff with kde + libthr (kernel built with > > sources from 18/9). > > > > Aggelos > > Are you running seti, rc4, etc? Any programs that sit in the background > and consume 100% of the cpu? No. But interactive performance deteriorates instantly when compiling or linking two or more programs (of course I expect it to deteriorate, but the gui is _much_ more jerky with SCHED_ULE than with SCHED_4BSD). Let me know if I can help with any more info. Aggelos
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200309300207.13767.aoiko>