Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 15:25:23 +0200 (CEST) From: Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de> To: rdivacky@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, Chagin Dmitry <dchagin@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: firefox & flash9 patches Message-ID: <200810031325.m93DPNnq005795@saturn.kn-bremen.de> In-Reply-To: <20081002071321.GA61530@freebsd.org> References: <200810011852.45247.tijl@ulyssis.org> <20081001170814.GA5962@dchagin.dialup.corbina.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <20081002071321.GA61530@freebsd.org> you write: >On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 09:08:14PM +0400, Chagin Dmitry wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 06:52:37PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >> > On Monday 29 September 2008 22:02:37 Chagin Dmitry wrote: >> > > please, test following patches (just -current). >> > > with them firefox && flash9 forks for me, >> > > I tested only on ia32@amd64 with 2.6.16 enabled, >> > > firefox 2.0.0.16 and flash9 plugin. >> > > >> > > If all is good, I will ask des@ and kib@ to review&commit them. thnx! >> > >> > On 7.1-PRERELEASE, linux 2.4, fc4, the linprocfs patch seems to improve >> > things a lot. I'm still having crashes from time to time, but overall >> > flash9 works much better. Great work! >> > >> >> second half of my patch (fooaffinity() related) can't be applied on RELENG_7, >> I will prepare a patch for RELENG_7, will test? > >I believe a reverse of this should do it: > > http://www.vlakno.cz/~rdivacky/linux_misc7.patch >(the patch is reversed so you have to patch -R it) I can confirm this and the patches posted by Tijl Coosemans get flash9 going on 7-stable amd64 here, at least for youtube. Great work guys! Juergen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200810031325.m93DPNnq005795>