Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 16 Mar 2000 13:19:09 -0700
From:      Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
To:        Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Doug Barton <Doug@gorean.org>, Josef Karthauser <joe@pavilion.net>, Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org>, stable@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: HEADS UP: 3.x -> 4.0-STABLE upgrade instructions 
Message-ID:  <200003162019.NAA96875@harmony.village.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 16 Mar 2000 11:53:58 PST." <Pine.BSF.4.21.0003161151590.63685-100000@freefall.freebsd.org> 
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0003161151590.63685-100000@freefall.freebsd.org>  

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.BSF.4.21.0003161151590.63685-100000@freefall.freebsd.org> Kris Kennaway writes:
: I still think we should be recommending people use 'make buildkernel' to
: build GENERIC and minimize the possibility of foot-shooting from a stupid
: config file which then gets blamed on 4.0 itself. Besides, I tried to
: rebuild my kernel from 3.4 using 'config' et al, but it didn't compile
: because the PATH was wrong and it was using the 3.x compiler/linker.

I agree with this.  I think that creating /GENERIC isn't a big deal
and I kinda like it.  It is certainly less confusing than some of the
alternatives.

Warner


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200003162019.NAA96875>