Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 13 Aug 2014 11:50:36 -0400
From:      Ajtim <lumiwa@gmail.com>
To:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Cc:        Tijl Coosemans <tijl@freebsd.org>, Bernhard =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=F6hlich?= <decke@freebsd.org>, Fernando =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Apestegu=EDa?= <fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com>
Subject:   Re: redports and build status
Message-ID:  <17051586.gQbKyLmFOD@lumiwa.farms.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAGwOe2bABx-7zcfgR3Wj_6=ZFfHvFtf-oYggNs1NR5MjS1=SRg@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAGwOe2bfPNknz=X_dHAmnJgVTM3F9huueZXwWr48yYOFY6BR9g@mail.gmail.com> <20140813123926.3354a660@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <CAGwOe2bABx-7zcfgR3Wj_6=ZFfHvFtf-oYggNs1NR5MjS1=SRg@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 13 August 2014 17:11:28 Fernando Apestegu=EDa wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Tijl Coosemans <tijl@freebsd.org> w=
rote:
> > On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 09:49:31 +0200 Bernhard Fr=F6hlich wrote:
> >> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Tijl Coosemans <tijl@freebsd.org>=
 wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 12 Aug 2014 19:38:27 +0200 Fernando Apestegu=EDa wrote:
> >>>> I built a port in redports and I received a mail notifying that =
the
> >>>> builds were finished, but it seems redports couldn't figure out =
if the
> >>>> builds finished successfully.
> >>>>=20
> >>>> https://redports.org/buildarchive/20140812170901-30860
> >>>=20
> >>> Any ideas of why this happened?
> >>>=20
> >>>> Thanks in advance.
> >>>=20
> >>> I'm seeing a lot of these as well. CCing decke@
> >>=20
> >> Yeah, the "finished" state is some rescue state in case something =
went
> >> terribly wrong. Usually this happens when something inside redport=
s fails
> >> or some backend behaves very weird or if the port creates some ver=
y
> >> strange
> >> situation like a recursive dependency (which fills up a temporary
> >> partition and then fails).
> >>=20
> >> If only one of many jobs fails then chances are good that it is so=
me
> >> redports weirdness. If many jobs fail (like in this case) and it i=
s
> >> reproducible then the chances are good that your port is doing som=
ething
> >> very very bad.
> >=20
> > I'm seeing these on multiple unrelated ports and with trivial chang=
es.
> > I've now cleared my redports tree, leaving only one unmodified port=
 and
> > it still results in all 'finished'.  Maybe redport's internal ports=
 tree
> > got corrupt or one of its cached packages?
>=20
> Mine is modified but nothing to do with dependencies or such. However=

> this problem is reproducible. This is the port:
>=20
> https://redports.org/browser/fernape/lang/basic256?rev=3D30358
>=20
> I don't see very bad things there or at least not compared with the
> previous revision which finished with "success"
>=20
> Can you think of anything I can try? I'm willing to help. I got used
> to run successfully tests in redports to attach them to my PR's and I=

> don't want to update this port until it builds properly.
>=20
> Regards

http://forums.freebsd.org/viewtopic.php?f=3D22&t=3D44800&start=3D75

--=20
ajtiM
--------
http://www.redbubble.com/people/lumiwa



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?17051586.gQbKyLmFOD>