Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 10:45:17 -0400 From: Mark Saad <nonesuch@longcount.org> To: Glen Barber <gjb@freebsd.org> Cc: FreeBSD-Stable ML <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com>, re@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Media image names - Document & rationalise. Message-ID: <CAMXt9NbdbNq15an%2BOspNPWbuKOhzpWn_RS3PA4kvn7EXJUmmrg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20141001143754.GF1275@hub.FreeBSD.org> References: <201410011358.s91DwOXJ033137@fire.js.berklix.net> <20141001143754.GF1275@hub.FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Glen Please tell me 11-RELEASE is like 2 years away . On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Glen Barber <gjb@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 03:58:24PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > Maybe there was an explanation of -uefi- on a mail list. One can > > guess: for [some?] newer machines try uefi. But could we put a more > > exact purpose of uefi images in a README ? > > > > The UEFI images will be documented in the release announcement email, > because they are specific to the 10.1-RELEASE cycle. 11.0-RELEASE will > have the functionality in the default installation medium. > > Glen > > -- mark saad | nonesuch@longcount.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAMXt9NbdbNq15an%2BOspNPWbuKOhzpWn_RS3PA4kvn7EXJUmmrg>