Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 12:41:05 -0600 (CST) From: Steve Price <sprice@hiwaay.net> To: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>, Zippy <seth@freebie.dp.ny.frb.org>, advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Netscape browser Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.4.02.9903191204290.22761-100000@fly.HiWAAY.net> In-Reply-To: <4.1.19990319103804.00a8ec60@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 19 Mar 1999, Brett Glass wrote: # At 10:53 AM 3/19/99 -0600, Steve Price wrote: # # >Why # >would a company write a native FreeBSD binary (for a market that # >doesn't exist) so the market that does exist can run it under # >emulation? [2] # # Again, to increase the size of the market. Another big incentive: # they can include tested, BSD-licensed code in their commercial # applications without giving away the farm due to the GPL. That's exactly my (counter)point. They don't believe the market exists, so writing it doesn't gain them anything in their minds. # >Your FreeBSDulator for Linux idea will only work if we convince # >them there is a market for FreeBSD and that more people will want # >to use FreeBSD than Linux. # # I disagree. If that were true, the emulator wouldn't be needed # at all. I will be needed so that the Linux advocates can run FreeBSD binaries. # >This is the reason that despite all # >its warts the Linuxulator is probably our best best right now. # >They develop a product for what they believe to be a safe bet and # >get an additional smaller market via emulation for free. # # You don't seem to get it. Emulation of a more popular platform # is not a positive; it's a negative! Sales into the FreeBSD # installed base are seen as sales into the Linux installed # base, and native ports never exist. This is what killed OS/2 # Warp. We must learn from history: he who emulates is in a # weaker position, not a stronger one. I do get it and I'm not advocating emulation. I'm advocating that we pound on their door and let them know that there is a market in FreeBSD. We do that by making them aware that we are using their Linux products in FreeBSD. If we don't and we continue to use their Linux offerings we only add to the numbers that say that Linux is popular. Yes there is a catch-22 here in that us supporting Linux emulation can be a hindrance but we have to find some way to convince them that FreeBSD does have market share while at the same time convincing people to use FreeBSD in the first place. # >What we should be focusing our effort on is getting them to realize # >that the market for FreeBSD *is* there. # # We can do that as well. But they won't unless they see native # FreeBSD versions of software selling. (Remember, marketroids are # completely blind to anything other than sales figures.) Which is why I have offered my services to several companies to do a port for them. They almost always come back with NDAs (which I have no problem with) and prices in the 5-digit range to buy in. # You can't suddenly "turn the tables" like that. Instead, you must # make gradual, persistent inroads based on your strengths. One # strength that Linux will NEVER have is commercially reusable # BSD-licensed code. If we make it usable for Linux via a FreeBSD # emulation library that runs on Linux, we can start winning binary # ports. And that's key. Yes, the tables must slowly turn themselves. # --Brett # # # To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.OSF.4.02.9903191204290.22761-100000>