Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:23:35 +0100 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> To: Chris <chrcoluk@gmail.com> Cc: "freebsd-performance@freebsd.org" <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>, Oliver Herold <oliver@akephalos.de>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD bind performance in FreeBSD 7 Message-ID: <47C331D7.6040001@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <3aaaa3a0802251250y248da081h4049d43f75ee2ee9@mail.gmail.com> References: <20080225133347.GA2446@asgard.home> <47C32274.2060706@FreeBSD.org> <3aaaa3a0802251250y248da081h4049d43f75ee2ee9@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Chris wrote: >> * 7.0 with ULE has a bug on this workload (actually to do with workloads >> involving high interrupt rates). It is fixed in 8.0. > > Kris can you say anything more about interrupt workload bugs on ULE? > On all my 7.0 servers I now am using ULE even on the UP ones as it was > said there is slight improvements for UP also but all the machines can > get intterupts intensive, lots of high speed transfers using nic > interrupts. In this scenario am I better of using 4BSD? I can't say for sure, you would have to do measurements of your throughput. It probably won't matter on UP though. Kris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47C331D7.6040001>