Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 12:23:09 -0600 From: Chris Moline <ugly-daemon@home.com> To: chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FW: FTP almost gone now? (was: Re: IPFW almost works now.) Message-ID: <20010615122309.B14716@h24-67-61-12.lb.shawcable.net> In-Reply-To: <200106131539.LAA02461@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>; from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu on Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 11:39:50AM -0400 References: <MFEFLELMIJGKDKPCJHAFEEGACDAA.pab@sysadmin-inc.com> <200106131539.LAA02461@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 11:39:50AM -0400, Garrett Wollman wrote: > > I was under the impression that the http protocol is a much 'chattier' > > protocol than ftp, and that regardless of them running on identical tcp > > connections, FTP is much more efficient by nature of the Protocol. > > Not at all. Here is a minimal HTTP request (assuming you're GETting > files; PUTting them is more involved): How does gopher compare?? I have heard that it is more efficient than http but I don't know how to find out. Chris Moline To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010615122309.B14716>