Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 4 Dec 2010 00:28:52 -0800
From:      Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com>
To:        perryh@pluto.rain.com
Cc:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org, egrosbein@rdtc.ru, mike@sentex.net
Subject:   Re: Problem with igb(4) updated to version 2.0.7
Message-ID:  <AANLkTimk3gg8GSkjQ3Z0TxRa924M33bDoiD_Mp9759ft@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4cf9ef71./9OtjLOA2%2BIV0UUh%perryh@pluto.rain.com>
References:  <AANLkTimWVJhtu8LrZ_tn0Tdr-vs9PmPnW9SjebT7jnyM@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTik%2B4Ag1HYXDWJvn2fTx6M%2Bpa9o29-A8j6qVRhZ_@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikwcRW%2BdqY=NTSbJsr3daEd-8usPo0Rw%2BhA_D-8@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTin3%2BbCaXoPxTQsvzmqgtpA1zSY8f17Qh-nqymPw@mail.gmail.com> <201011270946271408828@yahoo.com.cn> <AANLkTikG8RJQw%2Bh1SHZPs1cHGrM%2B3LfniZrdLqVoPVtr@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=YjG40%2BDj7471wyv3aeXGJgoL1GC33iNaypsrW@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=LgejYxRXnxLtkvB-Qfp2u%2BtySdriWHfGWPQjL@mail.gmail.com> <20101128081617.GA90332@zibbi.meraka.csir.co.za> <AANLkTinF1fovumkeXxWgaKi_bNiUCnqgWAtdaCaXELzO@mail.gmail.com> <4CF73A2C.7000802@rdtc.ru> <4CF89EE7.8020807@rdtc.ru> <AANLkTi=6N3Rz57YVNF1ZiDGEexnEXWr6oNPz9F=c2GpA@mail.gmail.com> <4CF93A77.30804@rdtc.ru> <4CF9470F.4020709@sentex.net> <4CF947D4.10504@rdtc.ru> <AANLkTin7hfqqwkudNHhrsyS_O7_-PCXffAWT1N85i31f@mail.gmail.com> <4cf9ef71./9OtjLOA2%2BIV0UUh%perryh@pluto.rain.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
LOL, ya, I have one of those switches that takes that long, a
Dell 5224,  takes some getting used to when you're used to
back to back speeds :)

There hasn't been any crying for this feature so I'm disinclined,
however if more than 1 or two want it I would reconsider.

Jack


On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 11:36 PM, <perryh@pluto.rain.com> wrote:

> Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > There are pros and cons either way you do things. I was talking
> > to some of our Linux crew, they recently changed things so it
> > would shut down the phy, but that doesn't always make everyone
> > happy either.
>
> In particular, depending on the type of switch and how it is
> configured, it may take 30 seconds or so after link is restored for
> the switch to do spanning-tree validation before it will start to
> pass traffic.
>
> There may be something to be said for making the driver's behavior
> configurable.
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTimk3gg8GSkjQ3Z0TxRa924M33bDoiD_Mp9759ft>