Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 12:08:05 +0200 From: Momchil Ivanov <momchil@xaxo.eu> To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, momchil@xaxo.eu Subject: Re: ULE Scheduler Message-ID: <861ulkkflm.wl%momchil@xaxo.eu> In-Reply-To: <201206120911.q5C9BaGj097969@lurza.secnetix.de> References: <86sje17jnx.wl%momchil@xaxo.eu> <201206120911.q5C9BaGj097969@lurza.secnetix.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At Tue, 12 Jun 2012 11:11:36 +0200 (CEST), Oliver Fromme wrote: > > ?????? ?????? <momchil@xaxo.eu> wrote: > > I compiled the same kernel with the 4BSD scheduler today and it seems > > that the processes jump accross cores too. > > What exactly is the problem that you're seeing? Do you have > performance problems? If so, then they're probably *not* > caused by processes "jumping across cores". When my laptop said bye bye because of the heat I thougt it might be the scheduler, which was a mistake since I got 30 C reduction on full load after cleaning. Therefore, I don't think that there is any problem. I was just curious why both processes are hopping around, because I would naively think that should not happen. Note that I am neither software nor hardware expert, but a mere user of both. I tried the 4BSD scheduler just because Dough asked if I did. For me the question is resolved and I thank all of you for the replies. > Have you read Daniel Kalchev's reply in this thread? > He explained very well why that's not a problem usually. No, I haven't received that one. Regards, Momchil
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?861ulkkflm.wl%momchil>