Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 31 Jul 2002 12:18:20 -0400
From:      Brad Laue <brad@brad-x.com>
To:        "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: /usr/sbin/ppp and /usr/sbin/pppd
Message-ID:  <3D480DCC.2010108@brad-x.com>
References:  <3D48015F.4020602@brad-x.com> <20020731161326.GB5957@madman.nectar.cc>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jacques A. Vidrine wrote:

>On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 11:25:19AM -0400, Brad Brad wrote:
>  
>
>>Question about these.
>>
>>These two seem to serve the same purpose. /usr/sbin/ppp seems to be the 
>>more advanced and secure of the two, especially in light of the security 
>>advisory (02:32) regarding /usr/sbin/pppd.
>>
>>Do we need to keep it?
>>    
>>
>
>yes, each ppp implementation has its pluses and minuses. pppd, for its
>part, is standard around BSD and many Linux distributions, and it is
>efficient as most packet processing occurs in the kernel.
>
>cheers,
>  
>
Can 2.4.0 work with FreeBSD? It would be good to keep current with that 
pppd if it's possible (although I haven't tried it).

Cheers,
Brad

-- 
// -- http://www.BRAD-X.com/ -- //




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3D480DCC.2010108>