Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 17:40:45 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: apache@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 206500] www/apache24: Include mod_proxy_html by default (or create separate port) Message-ID: <bug-206500-16115-jOSJV6zbhs@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-206500-16115@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-206500-16115@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D206500 Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|New |Open Keywords| |feature, needs-patch Summary|www/apache24: Include |www/apache24: Include |mod_proxy_html by default |mod_proxy_html by default | |(or create separate port) --- Comment #3 from Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> --- There are also certain out of the box expectations that users naturally have (per tutorials, documentation etc out there in the world), that we need to consider when we make decisions. POLA is still important, and this issue is a case in point, the result of a user (Ean, thank you!) asking the question in #FreeBSD on IRC. There *is* a= net overhead (mostly immeasurable) of special/snowflake installations that are = not the same as what upstreams provide. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-206500-16115-jOSJV6zbhs>