Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 16:13:10 -0600 From: Chris <racerx@makeworld.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portsdb -U fails Message-ID: <200402021613.23319.racerx@makeworld.com> In-Reply-To: <20040202211941.GC90670@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20040130195143.GA93830@seatle.vredesdorp.nl> <20040202204500.GA82776@seatle.vredesdorp.nl> <20040202211941.GC90670@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 02 February 2004 03:19 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 09:45:00PM +0100, r t g tan wrote: > > > Then why not quit banging you head on a wall and use "make index". Yo= ur > > > failure to adapt is spamming the list. Portsdb -U has not produced > > > totally clean INDEX runs since I can remember. Make index, on the oth= er > > > hand, is currently producing clean makes. > > > > > > There are times when one doesn't work and the other does. You just ha= ve > > > to not refuse anything but ports/INDEX. > > > > > > Kent > > > > > > -- > > > Kent Stewart > > > Richland, WA > > > > > > http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html > > > > make index fails as well with a bunch of make_index: no entrie messages. > > > > I guess Ill leave it at this waiting for it to get fixed. > > It's not broken. Please reread earlier advice given to you. > > Kris Or - perhaps wiping /usr/ports and starting from the CD? =2D --=20 Best regards, Chris =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 6.5.8 iQA/AwUBQB69ag+T/4DAG8NjEQJnfwCgs/Xq7GsgqzqdDcfEg0sRTuryexMAnjX3 oJaDvmgp3IV5ymwIoS5R3UNW =3Dfwxv =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200402021613.23319.racerx>