Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 17:28:10 +0100 From: "Ralf Mardorf" <ralf.mardorf@rocketmail.com> To: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> Cc: FreeBSD quest <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Usage of "restore" Message-ID: <op.wrmqo8k3uwjkcr@freebsd> In-Reply-To: <20130128165429.c5368afe.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <op.wrmmbb2cqhadp0@freebsd> <20130128165429.c5368afe.freebsd@edvax.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 16:54:29 +0100, Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> wrote:= > The answer is in "man restore". :-) No it isn't ;). I did read it. This was a Wald'n'B=C3=A4ume situation. Even if I would have add a .bz2,= I would have missed it, since on Linux I .tar.bz backups and it's more automated to extract a .tar.foo. However, I should add .bz2 in the futur= e. > Ern... two things: Do you _really_ have /bin/bash on FreeBSD? > I know this is possible. > > And do you use any bash-specific features in your script? If > not, why not use /bin/sh, the "universally" accepted standard? :-) No /bin/bash, # ls /usr/local/bin/bash /usr/local/bin/bash I run "bash file" instead of "sh file", IIRC I already had an issue when= = writing a script and running "sh file". I use it, since I use it on Linux too, another shell might cause issues,= = if I continue writing this script or if I should write another script. = Btw. I was an Assembler coder in the 80s and don't have much knowledge h= ow = to write shell scripts, if I need something I search for it. I'm using = *NIX as OS for audio productions and for the Internet, I'm not intereste= d = in programming anymore, I only do what's needed, *NIX OS are a tool for = = me. Philosophy about POSIX isn't a religion for me. I thought /bin/sh is a link to another shell. Regards, Ralf
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.wrmqo8k3uwjkcr>