Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 26 Apr 2000 13:23:26 +0930
From:      Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>
To:        Chuck Robey <chuckr@picnic.mat.net>
Cc:        Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>, "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org>, Boris Popov <bp@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: How about building modules along with the kernel? (was: cvs commit: src/sys/modules/syscons/fire fire_saver.c src/sys/modules/syscons/rain rain_saver.c src/sys/modules/syscons/warp warp_saver.c)
Message-ID:  <20000426132326.G40207@freebie.lemis.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0004252346240.331-100000@picnic.mat.net>
References:  <20000426124729.D40207@freebie.lemis.com> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0004252346240.331-100000@picnic.mat.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday, 25 April 2000 at 23:48:27 -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, Greg Lehey wrote:
>
>>> Just one, Greg.  I fully applaud the aim of this (heck, I thought I
>>> was being original when I came up with the idea 2 years ago ... I
>>> know better now) but it seems like there's 2 jobs, even though one
>>> is easier than the other.  What about changing the build, first, so
>>> that the modules are built and installed with the kernel, then AFTER
>>> that, worry about the versioning problem?
>>
>> Sure, the build is the easier part.  In fact, looking back, I see I've
>> forgotten a point:
>>
>> X.  Install the kernel and its modules in a subdirectory.  I'd suggest
>>     we call the subdirectory /kernel/, so we can rename the
>>     subdirectories on install the way we currently rename the kernel
>>     itself.  What do we call the kernel?  How about /kernel/FreeBSD?
>>
>>> That way, if we end up arguing about the versioning scheme for 2
>>> more years, at least *something* comes of this, something I think we
>>> all agree is needed?
>>
>> Well, let's see if we all agree :-)
>
> Tell you what.  Let the discussion carry on.  If there's no movement
> by Friday, I'll stick the offer back up.  I just want to insure that
> it doesn't die (again) by being stuck onto a proposal for too grand
> a design.

Sounds good.  How about: if nobody comes up with any objections by
Friday, just do it?  I suppose there will be fewer objections if the
defaults don't change very much.

Greg
--
Finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key
See complete headers for address and phone numbers


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000426132326.G40207>