Date: Thu, 07 Mar 1996 23:22:35 -0800 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: Ken Lam <klam@awod.com> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: New kernel option proposed.. Message-ID: <16812.826269755@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 07 Mar 1996 22:24:38 EST." <1.5.4b11.32.19960308032438.006be60c@awod.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Hmmm.. seems more obvious, but then won't that kind of mean that we > can't say RTFM? After all, the standard 4.4bsd manuals, Unix System > Administrator Handbook, etc.. all refer to GENERIC in their kernel > configuration sections. I'm not proposing to remove the generic kernel, simply the magic meaning of the keyword "GENERIC" in our kernel sources. What if you wanted to compile a non-GENERIC kernel with safety belts still intact? Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?16812.826269755>