Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 15:29:07 -0400 From: Jason Andresen <jandrese@mitre.org> To: Dennis <dennis@etinc.com> Cc: Anton Berezin <tobez@tobez.org>, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gcc -O bug Message-ID: <3AE87703.69273C08@mitre.org> References: <nospam-988290015.71499@maxim.gbch.net> <xzplmonx31m.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20010426144848.B17373@heechee.tobez.org> <nospam-988290015.71499@maxim.gbch.net> <5.0.2.1.0.20010426133342.032c48f0@mail.etinc.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dennis wrote: > > At 09:11 AM 04/26/2001, you wrote: > >On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 11:00:15PM +1000, Greg Black wrote: > >Nope. The real nonsense is what you say. Perl core is written in a > >highly optimized C using very polished algorithms. As long as the Perl > >script is written in such a way as to minimize the number of OPCODEs > >executed and maximize the time spent inside the OPCODE executor engine, > >it is not exactly trivial to beat it in C, unless you are willing to > >spent a considerable time polishing your code (which is not worth it for > >your typical log analyzer). > > Don't try to argue this ridiculous point on this list. You are badly > overmatched. You are so wrong that its not worthy of debate. Youch! I think most people on this list can see where this is going. Please take this thread to email before it becomes a full fledged inferno. Remember kids: Only YOU can prevent troll fires. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3AE87703.69273C08>