Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 01:18:36 +0200 From: Palle Girgensohn <girgen@pingpong.net> To: "Justin L. Boss" <justin@cpaaa.org>, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I'm not a porter but there are 2 ports I would hate to see go Message-ID: <70FA37D0ECB981383F68AA90@palle.girgensohn.se> In-Reply-To: <200406220949.30468.justin@cpaaa.org> References: <200406220949.30468.justin@cpaaa.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I built the whole opengroupware native a while back, but then couldn't find = the time to actually port it. It would require some time, since many parts=20 require prerequisites to be installed, and most standard stuff that should=20 really be used from standard ports (like gnustep stuff, spidermonkey etc)=20 won=E4t work unless they're built with opengroupware, since they have local = patches to almost everything. :( Still, maybe I'll find some time this summer to wrap it up to bunch of=20 ports. Would it be worth the effort? Is anyone using it? BTW, the problem is only with apache2, and also is probably fixed. anybody=20 checked it? /Palle --On tisdag, juni 22, 2004 09.49.30 -0500 "Justin L. Boss"=20 <justin@cpaaa.org> wrote: > linux-opengroupware-1.0_1: > I just think this will be a bad for FreeBSD, we need this one.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?70FA37D0ECB981383F68AA90>