Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 13:46:26 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org> To: Jason Hellenthal <jhell@DataIX.net> Cc: Brandon Gooch <jamesbrandongooch@gmail.com>, =?iso-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no>, freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PAM modules Message-ID: <1875031368.20110917134626@serebryakov.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <20110917052434.GA32989@DataIX.net> References: <86boukbk8s.fsf@ds4.des.no> <CALBk6y%2BbQOrfL01i7j5eAb-OmFA=4pxh6ni-5LULqXuFrjDFhA@mail.gmail.com> <20110917051827.GA27245@DataIX.net> <20110917052434.GA32989@DataIX.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, Jason. You wrote 17 =F1=E5=ED=F2=FF=E1=F0=FF 2011 =E3., 9:24:34: > security/pam_ldap A pam module for authenticating with LDAP It needs nss_ldap too for reasonnabel work, and in such case `net/nss-pam-ldapd' is better, as it two-in-one, may be with stripped out cache daemon. But all these ldap-related modules are strange in their desire to have config files like "ldap.conf" :) --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1875031368.20110917134626>