Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 21:09:06 +0900 (JST) From: Shigeyuki Fukushima <shige@FreeBSD.org> To: will@physics.purdue.edu Cc: asami@FreeBSD.org, jdp@FreeBSD.org, sf@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/editors Makefile ports/editors/emacs21 Makefile distinfo pkg-comment pkg-descr pkg-message pkg-plist ports/editors/emacs21/files patch-configure.in patch-lib-src:Makefile.in patch-man:Makefile.in Message-ID: <20011029.210906.32999932.shige@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20011029052851.Q25747@squall.waterspout.com> References: <20011024150015.Q25747@squall.waterspout.com> <20011029.142548.06934931.shige@FreeBSD.org> <20011029052851.Q25747@squall.waterspout.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu> Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/editors Makefile ports/editors/emacs21 Makefile distinfo pkg-comment pkg-descr pkg-message pkg-plist ports/editors/emacs21/files patch-configure.in patch-lib-src:Makefile.in patch-man:Makefile.in Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 05:28:51 -0500 > Well, I guess that would work... do you really need/want 3 > versions of emacs in ports? No. Now, I think that we want Emacs users (as many as possible) to use emacs-20.x or later, and we needn't support emacs-19.x port. As well as emacs20 when emacs20 is obsolete. Even if we delete the port of obsolete version from port tree, we can checkout it as a previous revision. # we should tagify to a previous revision or not? Since, I think that we want to leave it only when we feel like to need its (obsolete version) package. --- shige To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011029.210906.32999932.shige>