Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 4 Dec 2010 01:08:51 -0800
From:      Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com>
To:        Eugene Grosbein <egrosbein@rdtc.ru>
Cc:        freebsd-net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
Subject:   Re: Problem with igb(4) updated to version 2.0.7
Message-ID:  <AANLkTim_%2BYOvUgBAveciSoWUiGL46068ieHAEhYsU8kT@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4CFA0435.7020100@rdtc.ru>
References:  <AANLkTimWVJhtu8LrZ_tn0Tdr-vs9PmPnW9SjebT7jnyM@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTik%2B4Ag1HYXDWJvn2fTx6M%2Bpa9o29-A8j6qVRhZ_@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikwcRW%2BdqY=NTSbJsr3daEd-8usPo0Rw%2BhA_D-8@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTin3%2BbCaXoPxTQsvzmqgtpA1zSY8f17Qh-nqymPw@mail.gmail.com> <201011270946271408828@yahoo.com.cn> <AANLkTikG8RJQw%2Bh1SHZPs1cHGrM%2B3LfniZrdLqVoPVtr@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=YjG40%2BDj7471wyv3aeXGJgoL1GC33iNaypsrW@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=LgejYxRXnxLtkvB-Qfp2u%2BtySdriWHfGWPQjL@mail.gmail.com> <20101128081617.GA90332@zibbi.meraka.csir.co.za> <AANLkTinF1fovumkeXxWgaKi_bNiUCnqgWAtdaCaXELzO@mail.gmail.com> <4CF73A2C.7000802@rdtc.ru> <4CF89EE7.8020807@rdtc.ru> <AANLkTi=6N3Rz57YVNF1ZiDGEexnEXWr6oNPz9F=c2GpA@mail.gmail.com> <4CF93A77.30804@rdtc.ru> <4CF9470F.4020709@sentex.net> <4CF947D4.10504@rdtc.ru> <AANLkTin7hfqqwkudNHhrsyS_O7_-PCXffAWT1N85i31f@mail.gmail.com> <4CFA0435.7020100@rdtc.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This isn't some simple 'go change this line or parameter',
there were some problematic issues that my Linux coworkers
faced, I have to go look into it before I even decide...

so...patience friend.

Jack


2010/12/4 Eugene Grosbein <egrosbein@rdtc.ru>

> On 04.12.2010 04:00, Jack Vogel wrote:
> > There are pros and cons either way you do things. I was talking to some
> > of our
> > Linux crew, they recently changed things so it would shut down the phy,
> > but that
> > doesn't always make everyone happy either.
>
> Of course, that should be made optional with default 'keep link on'
> due to POLA.
>
> > Just saying that my FreeBSD drivers have not done so forever :)
>
> Glad to know it's technically possible. I'd like to patch my tree
> manually to get this behavour right now. What direction should I take -
> use ACPI D3 or something else? I need to brink link down per-port
> for dual-port cards.
>
> Eugene Grosbein
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTim_%2BYOvUgBAveciSoWUiGL46068ieHAEhYsU8kT>