Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 7 Jan 2002 20:59:34 +0100
From:      Wilko Bulte <wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl>
To:        John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/release/sysinstall install.c
Message-ID:  <20020107205934.B11743@freebie.xs4all.nl>
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.020107115532.jhb@FreeBSD.org>; from jhb@FreeBSD.org on Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 11:55:32AM -0800
References:  <20020107195440.A11126@freebie.xs4all.nl> <XFMail.020107115532.jhb@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 11:55:32AM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
> 
> On 07-Jan-02 Wilko Bulte wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 10:26:44AM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
> >> 
> >> On 07-Jan-02 Wilko Bulte wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 03:00:21PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> >> >> 
> >> >> 
> >> >> On Mon, 07 Jan 2002 04:44:29 PST, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> >> >> 
> >> >> >   Modified files:        (Branch: RELENG_4)
> >> >> >     release/sysinstall   install.c 
> >> >> >   Log:
> >> >> >   MFC rev 1.316: revert to old newfs 8192/1024 block/frag sizes on the
> >> >> >   alpha
> >> >> 
> >> >> This is required to avoid triggering whatever bugs exist in the Alpha
> >> >> boot code that prevent it from using a root partition with a block size
> >> >> other than 8192.
> >> >> 
> >> >> If anyone has any great ideas for a low impact method of reducing the
> >> >> effect of this regression to just the root partition on Alphas for
> >> >> 4.5-RELEASE, I'm all ears. :-)
> >> > 
> >> > Strange.. 2 hours ago I tested my RC0 snapshot (so without this revert)
> >> > on a DS20 and it boots just fine after the install.
> >> > 
> >> > What errros do you get?
> >> 
> >> Humm, see the '-CURRENT boot1 broken?' thread in -alpha from a week or so
> >> ago. 
> >> Christan "naddy" <can't remember last name> noted that either boot1 or
> >> perhaps
> > 
> > Weisgerber
> > 
> >> the loader blew up when he reinstalled current with 16384/2048. 
> >> Reformatting
> >> the disk as 8192/1024 fixed his problem.
> > 
> > Apparantly current != releng_4 for this one as I did not see it when trying
> > my RC0 miniinst. The default for sysinstalls was/is 16386/2048 (before this
> > commit I mean) right? I just accepted sysinstalls defaults I mean.
> 
> Hmm, perhaps sysinstall is overriding newfs in stable still?  We should see if

No, it is not according to dumpfs:

# dumpfs /
magic   11954   time    Mon Jan  7 19:31:24 2002
id      [ 3c39f491 5bc0397e ]
cylgrp  dynamic inodes  4.4BSD
nbfree  5229    ndir    78      nifree  14972   nffree  430
ncg     1       ncyl    65      size    65540   blocks  64499
bsize   16384   shift   14      mask    0xffffc000
fsize   2048    shift   11      mask    0xfffff800

-- 
|   / o / /_  _   		email: 	wilko@FreeBSD.org
|/|/ / / /(  (_)  Bulte		Arnhem, The Netherlands	

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020107205934.B11743>