Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      21 Jan 2001 19:37:50 +0100
From:      Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
To:        smp@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: debug.witness_skipspin
Message-ID:  <xzp4rys69a9.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
In-Reply-To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav's message of "21 Jan 2001 19:33:28 %2B0100"
References:  <xzp8zo469hj.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> writes:
> Is there a particular reason why this sysctl is read-only? Just for
> laughs, I built a kernel with a writeable debug.witness_skipspin, and
> experienced no ill effects from switching back and forth.

Hey, I seem to have a thing with stupid questions today. Making it
writeable doesn't make a difference because all the spin locks are
already initialized (and enrolled or not) before you even get a chance
to toggle it. Nothing beats reading the source...

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzp4rys69a9.fsf>