Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 21:44:41 +0800 From: Xiaofan Chen <xiaofanc@gmail.com> To: ticso@cicely.de Cc: adk0212@gmail.com, freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Subject: Re: apcupsd port regression from 7x. to 8.x Message-ID: <k2ua276da401005070644j94823219n63e6c7b381047ca2@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20100507132724.GO3185@cicely7.cicely.de> References: <201005061949.o46Jngdt028521@lava.sentex.ca> <201005062240.30548.hselasky@c2i.net> <201005062056.o46KuV0k028879@lava.sentex.ca> <20100507132724.GO3185@cicely7.cicely.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely7.cicely.de> wrot= e: >> I am guessing the program would need to be re-written to use v1.0 >> ? =A0Thanks for the feedback and help as always! > > I recently converted own code to 1.0 API, just to get negative > feedback from Debian users, since they only offer libusb 0.1 packages > for anything but bleeding edge development versions. > I assume because of this the old API will still be around for some time. > Hmm, that is a bit strange. But you are right Debian/Ubuntu still have libusb-0.1 and libusb-1.0. Other Linux distros move to libusb-1.0 and libusb-0.1-compat since libusb-0.1 is no longer maintained by the developers and the bug reports are treated as "won't fix". http://www.libusb.org/report/1 --=20 Xiaofan (part of the libusb-win32 admin team)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?k2ua276da401005070644j94823219n63e6c7b381047ca2>