Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 19:11:44 -0500 From: George Mitchell <george@m5p.com> To: Tom Evans <tevans.uk@googlemail.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default Message-ID: <4EE93B40.3090101@m5p.com> In-Reply-To: <CAFHbX1%2B5PttyZuNnYot8emTn_AWkABdJCvnpo5rcRxVXj0ypJA@mail.gmail.com> References: <4EE1EAFE.3070408@m5p.com> <CAJ-FndDniGH8QoT=kUxOQ%2BzdVhWF0Z0NKLU0PGS-Gt=BK6noWw@mail.gmail.com> <4EE2AE64.9060802@m5p.com> <4EE88343.2050302@m5p.com> <CAFHbX1%2B5PttyZuNnYot8emTn_AWkABdJCvnpo5rcRxVXj0ypJA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/14/11 12:54, Tom Evans wrote: > [...] This thread has shown that ULE performs poorly > in very specific scenarios where the server is loaded with NCPU+1 CPU > bound processes, [...] Minor correction: Problem occurs when there are nCPU compute-bound processes, not nCPU + 1. -- George Mitchell
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EE93B40.3090101>