Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 02:25:33 -0700 (PDT) From: Kelly Yancey <kbyanc@posi.net> To: Andrzej Bialecki <abial@webgiro.com> Cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SysctlFS Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007130224480.43271-100000@gateway.posi.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.20.0007121328020.49102-100000@mx.webgiro.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 12 Jul 2000, Andrzej Bialecki wrote: > Hi, > > I've been tweaking the sysctls here and there for some time now, and I'd > like to see what is the current opinion on implementing sysctl tree as a > filesystem. Most of the work I've done with dynamic sysctls is very > similar to what happens with filesystem. Also, filesystem model allows for > much more fine-grained access control. Arg. I've already been working on this in private. :/ Kelly -- Kelly Yancey - kbyanc@posi.net - Belmont, CA System Administrator, eGroups.com http://www.egroups.com/ Maintainer, BSD Driver Database http://www.posi.net/freebsd/drivers/ Coordinator, Team FreeBSD http://www.posi.net/freebsd/Team-FreeBSD/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0007130224480.43271-100000>