Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 17:12:01 +0100 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> To: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MFC wishlist Message-ID: <41E54C51.4000300@fer.hr> In-Reply-To: <20050108034424.GA94365@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <41DF253C.5040705@fer.hr> <20050108005540.GB93568@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20050108030707.GA3656@frontfree.net> <20050108034424.GA94365@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Steve Kargl wrote: > On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 11:07:07AM +0800, Xin LI wrote: > >>On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 04:55:40PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: >> >>>On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 01:11:40AM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote: >>> >>>>It's been a while now and (judging from this list at least), people are >>>>not complaining about ULE, so maybe (with re@ approval) the fix & >>>>supporting infrastructure could be brought to RELENG_5? >>>> >>> >>>That's not a good idea. I can lock up ULE+PREEMPTION on >>This is observed in pre-5.3RELEASE CURRENT, but I thought Jeff has > I'm talking about 6-CURRENT. My last kernel/world build is Are there plans for assigning more priority/resources on solving this? Maybe mark it as show-stopper for 5.4? (it's currently not even on the http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.4R/todo.html list)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41E54C51.4000300>