Date: Sun, 07 Sep 1997 20:00:13 -0700 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: adam@veda.is, jfieber@indiana.edu, ache@nagual.pp.ru, chuckr@glue.umd.edu, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/netscape4 Makefile ports/www/netscape4/files md5 ports/www/netscape4/pkg PLIST Message-ID: <22145.873687613@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 07 Sep 1997 17:56:50 PDT." <199709080056.RAA22731@hub.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The GOLD vs non-GOLD Navigator port isn't interactive yet it still manages to announce the presence of the option pretty convincingly to me. Jordan > Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > > > > yes, please one port for navigator and one for communicator. > > > > Ick. What's wrong with a hack similar to the GOLD variable currently > > used to select Navigator or Navigator Gold? You could: > > > > cd /usr/ports/www/netscape4 > > make all install MINIMAL=yes > > > > Or something? > > will it be INTERACTIVE? > if not, many will not find it. > ports == instant applications != read the makefile > jmb
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?22145.873687613>