Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 22:28:39 +0200 From: John Hay <jhay@icomtek.csir.co.za> To: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf newvers.sh Message-ID: <20030602202839.GA50668@zibbi.icomtek.csir.co.za> In-Reply-To: <200306021807.h52I7MkA004368@harmony.village.org> References: <20030602180133.GA45896@zibbi.icomtek.csir.co.za> <200306020458.h524whgY010245@repoman.freebsd.org> <200306021807.h52I7MkA004368@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 12:07:22PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > In message <20030602180133.GA45896@zibbi.icomtek.csir.co.za> John Hay writes: > : Wouldn't it be less confusing to just call it 5-CURRENT? > > We change on -STABLE branch this way. I also think that in the 3.x > delayed branch did the same thing. But -STABLE happens after a release, -CURRENT happens before. Maybe we should call it 5.2-CURRENT then. :-) What are we going to call it when RELENG_5 gets branced? 6-CURRENT, and that is before 6.x comes out. John -- John Hay -- John.Hay@icomtek.csir.co.za / jhay@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030602202839.GA50668>